Games like FlyNET

Stan · Post by **Stan** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:23 pm

The passenger Terminal idea was FL,s but was seized upon by FSE when Mike mentioned it, so he keeps very quiet about the features of the new site nowadays.I dont think they are needed here though,much prefer the way we get passengers at the moment.But this first class ,second class thing seems to be a good idea.Yes ,Konny will have to keep this progrm up to date if he wishes to stay number one,which IMHP he is at the moment.

JamesMc · Post by **JamesMc** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:07 pm

Stan wrote:The passenger Terminal idea was FL,s but was seized upon by FSE when Mike mentioned it, so he keeps very quiet about the features of the new site nowadays.I dont think they are needed here though,much prefer the way we get passengers at the moment.But this first class ,second class thing seems to be a good idea.Yes ,Konny will have to keep this progrm up to date if he wishes to stay number one,which IMHP he is at the moment.

I can't comment on who's idea it was because it's been talked about for ages. It could be Mike's. Either way it doesn't matter.

I agree completely with you that they are not needed here. Completely different setup here and it seems to be working fine. The different class idea is great and I'm sure all the guys here will continue to make improvements over time.

I think trying to compare the different sites really is impossible to do fairly as it really depends on what you want. I've now flown at the three discussed here and all three are different in a good way.

flightsimer · Post by **flightsimer** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 9:07 pm

ya, but it was mikes idea, that is a fact, because now he wont say really anything about the new site, mainly things that will be new to the site.

ionathon, u registered with the forum? ill talk to sean or marv if u want me to, theyll get u set up in no time.

Stan · Post by **Stan** » Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:06 pm

I think trying to compare the different sites really is impossible to do fairly as it really depends on what you want. I've now flown at the three discussed here and all three are different in a good way.

I have flown on all three but all at the same time with the same type of aircraft bearing the same reg.Seemed like a good idea at the time.

JamesMc · Post by **JamesMc** » Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:18 am

flightsimer wrote:ya, but it was mikes idea, that is a fact

Deciding facts is a hard thing to do but if thats what makes you happy then we'll go with it. It's obviously important

Stan · Post by **Stan** » Tue Nov 06, 2007 1:32 am

I dont think its important to this program because the way we get our passengers is ok at the moment,but that may change in the future.