Page 1 of 2
Does seem to be a problem
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:50 pm
by Wolfar100
I would like to know how you can put this much fuel in a Cessna Caravan? LMAO!
Comment
none
WAL104 Jan 23, 19:24
Flight Number Virtual Airline Max Sim-Rate Used
WAL21 Wolf AirLines 1x
A/C Type Registration PAX
C208 WALCA02 10
Departure Planned Arrival Arrival Distance Duration Block Fuel
KTUS \ 00:00 KPHX KTUS \ 19:00 96nm 19:00 (19h) -107kg
Pilot Rating Critique
35% Aircraft crashed
Did not land at planned destination
Finances
Income from tickets: PAX ( 10 ) x Ticketprice ( 0v$ ) 0v$
Fuel cost: Fuel Price ( 1.38v$ ) x 1.234 x Fuel Bought ( 126750kg ) -215845v$
Crew & catering cost: -50v$
Cargo income: 0v$/100nm x Distance ( 96nm ) x Cargo ( 0kg ) 0v$
Bonus: 0v$
Pilot salary: Airline Income x Pilot salary percentage -0v$
Gross profit: -215895v$
x Multiplier ( 500 ) -107947500v$
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:49 pm
by thepilotace
I onbehalf of Euro Link DEMAND this be changed to something appropiate.
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:56 pm
by Wolfar100
I have petitioned to have this flight removed and my companies money returned. Not sure about my companies reputation though. I see NO damage to the aircraft in question and the pilot must have been scared off by the 107 million dollar bill because he quit and flew the coup.
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:01 pm
by tall_guy_pete
Very nice Andy lol
Don't worry mate; this obvously wasn't your fault
Im expecting that FlyNet staff will take care of this matter appropriately
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:02 pm
by Konny
I deleted both reports and all the connected money transfers.
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:13 pm
by tall_guy_pete
Cheers Konny.
Let Kurk know ... teach him to learn how to "TEST" ! It is getting rediculas all this updating ... all these mistakes he is making suggests he needs help with his math
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:14 pm
by Wolfar100
Quite frankly all I could do was
LAUGH! I knew that it would be fixed. My pilot reported that his Caravan could not get airborne with that much fuel on board! HAR HAR!
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:19 pm
by tall_guy_pete
Well in my view (as a programmer) something isn't right with his methods ...
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:21 pm
by Wolfar100
tall_guy_pete wrote:Well in my view (as a programmer) something isn't right with his methods ...
I am not a programmer just a mechanic and a networking computer guru. Dabbled in Programming and it is not for me!
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:22 pm
by DaKurt
you should see the computer I have to work with ... it's quite hard to program FlyNET on it....
furthermore I never went to school which didn't help much in my mathematical education. AND the hardest thing about programming is that I'm just guessing all C++ comands as I never learned it
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:31 pm
by tall_guy_pete
Now that looks like an Apple Lisa 1? / 2?
Weren't they released like 20 odd years ago?
Must be worth a fortune if you still got it working mate
Never tried a Mac, will have to one day
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:33 pm
by tall_guy_pete
Get yourself over to MSDN library mate, they got loads of articles on C++. I don't like C++ ... prefer VB easier to program in I think.
The only thing I can do in C++ is install shield stuff.
Haven't had time to learn it further .. more into my SSADM stuff
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:36 pm
by thepilotace
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:45 pm
by tall_guy_pete
DaKurt, not being assertive mate but I think we need to teach you on how to consider users who are using the end product.
I realise that this is a freeware project and respect that. I also respect the fact that you use your freetime to contribute to this.
Please odn't take this the wrong way as I mean no harm, and as my collegueas do too *cough* Andy, be careful with your words
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:46 pm
by DaKurt
