Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:23 pm
by Jon.M
Terror wrote:
30% of the market share.
True.
Followed by derision.
Jon
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:36 am
by cmdrnmartin
We are, as always, investigating thoroughly.
Just so you know, this sort of thing isn't tolerated, and you'll see repercussions.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:51 am
by joefremont
Personally I think its up to the CEO's and the pilots if they use compression or not, they already get less revenue because of the lower bonus. Personally I have more respect for someone who watches that 8000nm flight zip at 16x than someone who sleeps through that same flight at 1x.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:54 am
by Terror
Compression is not the problem. Using the fsnav feature of move aircraft to here to skip several thousand miles is. But the mods are dealing with it.
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:58 am
by Wolfar100
Ok I see that the airline in question has so far cleaned up their act. But what about all the flights that happened and the statistics where they vaulted into first place?
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:28 am
by CAPFlyer
I'm not sure how many times we can say this - IT WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF.
I'm locking this thread as I see no further use for it except for more whining about how long it takes to get this resolved and taken care of.